Literacy Now

In a recent column for the Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, I indicate the need to encourage students to not only read, but write online text. I believe we need to move students from content consumers to content curators, to individuals who construct online content. The truth is that as technologies and literacy advance it is becoming easier and easier to play, create, and post digital content on the Internet. More to the point, we can provide opportunities for our students to rewrite, recreate, or remix information.

What Do You Mean by Remix?

We live in a remix culture. When I use terms like "remix" or "mashup," it may sound foreign or taboo, that it doesn't make sense I can read something online, and then rewrite or recreate it.

For a better understanding of the pervasive nature of remix in culture, I recommend Kirby Ferguson's Ted Talk, " Embracing the Remix".

Keep in mind that many have already seen plenty examples of remix in popular culture. One of the key examples I provide for remix includes the recent spate of remixes of Brian Williams content from The Tonight Show.

Getting Started With Remix Using Popcorn

Now that we're beginning to understand the nature of remix and mashup in culture, one of my favorite tools to use with students and teachers to explore the nature of remix in composing online content is Mozilla Popcorn. Popcorn is one of the fantastic, FREE tools offered by the Webmaker community to help teach and learn digital skills and web literacy. Learn more about Popcorn, through the following video from Kevin Hodgson, or check out Common Sense Graphite.

To get started with Popcorn, I first start with teachers in class, or professional development and ask them to write down six words that they identify with. In the Webmaker TeachTheWeb Massive Open Online Collorabtion this was called the Six Word Memoir assignment. I view the Six Word Memoir assignment as a digital alternative to the traditional BioPoem activity. After teachers identify their six words, I show them the basics of Popcorn, and then allow them to remix my Six Word Memoir. With some time and tinkering, educators are quickly adding in their own photos, music, and text to my content.

Read, Write, and Remix Your Identity

After teachers become a bit more experienced with manipulating Popcorn, I usually up the ante by showing them to the version of My Philosophy Statement. In the Webmaker MOOC this was labeled your credo, but at its simplest form it is a philosophy of teaching and learning statement. In our Instructional Technology & Digital Media Literacy (#ITDML) program, we require students (veteran teachers) to start the program by blogging about their philosophy statement. At the end of the program they remix this statement using what they've learned. Many students choose to remix my content as a starting point. Here is my credo to review and remix.

W. Ian O'Byrne is an assistant professor in the Department of Education at the University of New Haven. You can read his blog , follow him on Twitter (@wiobyrne), or on Google+.
This article is part of a series from the Technology in Literacy Education Special Interest Group (TILE-SIG).

I vividly remember sitting in a graduate reading course where we were discussing Walt Whitman's poem “My Papa's Waltz” and feeling extremely uncomfortable. Usually, I was a very active participant in class and enjoyed engaging in discussions with my peers. This time it was very different. I felt like I wanted to disappear under the table, fearful of being called upon and not having the "right" answer. I worried that my interpretation of the poem would not be what the professor wanted or be the same as my classmates. I was scared of being different. I was reminded of this scenario just a few years later when I took a teaching position at an alternative school for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.

Students identified with emotional and behavior disorders (EBD) typically have been labeled as disruptive, insolent, disobedient, and displaying frequent behaviors that impede learning and interfere with the educational process, as noted by Michael Fitzpatrick and Earl Knowlton in Preventing School Failure. I understood that my student’s prior academic experiences were very similar to my experience with My Papa’s Waltz. I knew I had to create meaningful and engaging learning experiences.  

I chose to implement digital poetry as part of my writing instruction. Today’s students live in a multimedia world and my students were no different. They were very motivated to use technology and I felt that by integrating technology into a poetry unit, I could overcome the negative behavior of my students and engage them in the learning process. Jeffery Schwartz argues in Teach the New Writing that the understanding of writing and communication by today’s students has surpassed that of their parents. Furthermore, “to teach reading and writing in a global world, we need to follow our students’ lead into a new understanding of media text.”

I began the digital poetry project by having students create digital biography poems. The students began by using a template to compose "I Am" biography poems. Then using Windows Moviemaker Live software which comes standard on PC's, the students transformed their poems into digital poetry by adding images, audio, effects, and transitions to extend the meaning of their poems and create a representation of themselves. This was a very powerful activity for these learners because it allowed for them to share information about themselves and successfully engage in academic learning. They were comfortable sharing their lives through the digital poems and it brought us closer as a community of learners.

Building on the success of the “I Am” poems, we engaged in a deeper study of poets and poetry. Again the students would create digital poems but this time they would interpret their favorite poems. The students began by reading the poems of many notable poets and choosing their favorites. After some sharing time and discussion, the students chose the poem they wanted to turn into a digital movie. I provided them with storyboarding organizers and they planned their digital poems, screen by screen, integrating the text with images and audio. Next, they uploaded their images and text to Windows Moviemaker and completed their poems with adding transitions, effects, and audio. The finished poems demonstrated a level of interpretation that I do not think I would have seen from my students if we had just discussed the poems face to face. For example, Jenna, an eighth grader, chose the poem “Little Girl Be Careful What You Say”by Carl Sandburg. For her digital interpretation, she only used black and white images. When asked why, she stated that she really wanted to convey the mood of the poem which to her felt very somber. I do not think the students would have been able to share this level of interpretation without the aid of digital technology.

I have since moved on from the alternative school to my current position as a university professor where I teach undergraduate and graduate course in literacy. The digital poetry project has become a staple in my graduate language arts course. The feedback from my students has been extremely positive. They have enjoyed being introduced to this new medium and many have indicated that they plan to implement similar projects in their own teaching. They too have realized the value of incorporating digital technology into literacy instruction.

A sample of the poems created by students can be found on Facebook.

Dr. Kristin Webber is a veteran teacher with over 20 years of teaching experience. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Early Childhood and Reading at Edinboro University where she teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses in literacy. She also serves as the Program Head for the Graduate Reading Program. While in the classroom, Kristin has taught at every level from preschool to high school. Her research interests include the New Literacies, instructional technology, adolescent literacy, and reluctant readers. This article is part of a series from the International Reading Association’s Technology in Literacy Education Special Interest Group (TILE-SIG).

Dear Online Concept Map,

I am sorry. I have ignored you for some time. I knew you existed but, as a time-poor teacher, your software seemed unnecessary. I assumed that having each student use pencil and paper to compose a concept-map in his/her own exercise book was a sufficient alternative to an online version. Forgive me. I didn’t realize your software had additional features to stimulate critical and creative thinking. And who would have thought that you sought to have students collaborate to compose each concept map, let alone that you wanted these students to share their maps with others? I promise to never dismiss your potential again.

Apologetically Yours,

High School Teacher

***

A recent encounter with the technical report “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them” by Joseph D. Novak and Alberto J. Cañas (2008) provided this educator with the opportunity to recast concept maps as a central and meaningful, rather than a supplementary, learning activity. Novak and Cañas’s report triggered a new appreciation for online concept maps due to their suitability for collaboration and ability to trigger critical and creative thinking.

The benefits of online concept maps over their offline equivalent:

• Multiple students can collaborate in real time to create, edit, and debate their concept map’s construction. Screenshots can be taken or URLs generated to enable sharing with other students.

• Online versions of concept maps may be edited, refined, and enhanced at all stages of their construction. Concepts initially placed in one part of an online map can be dragged easily to a different section should the students recognize a more appropriate or additional relationship.

• Some online concept mapping tools allow users to see a step-by-step animation of the concept map’s construction. This feature can prompt revealing conversations between teachers and students about their cognitive processes and understanding of the topic.

• Some software packages allow for URLs, images, and annotated notes can be hyperlinked to each node (the shape containing a single concept within the map). Other tools allow for students to link an individual node to a separate, but related, concept map. Following such links allows students to dive deeper into concepts of personal interest or need.

• While concepts can be provided by the teacher, or identified by the students, the appropriate cross-links lines and arrows interlace the concepts to show a relationship. Cross-links can include linking words/prepositions (is, has, enables, implies, produces, is reliant on, raises the issue of) must be determined and applied to the concept map. Critical thinking skills are essential at this stage of the map’s construction to ensure the cross-links selected convey their understanding of the topic accurately.

Nicole Timbrell is a high school English teacher at Loreto Kirribilli in Sydney, Australia. In 2013-2014 she took a year away from the classroom to complete graduate study in Cognition, Instruction and Learning Technologies at the University of Connecticut. Follow her on twitter at @nicloutim.

As a former ancient history teacher, I occasionally receive resource requests from former colleagues. I was prepping a collection of my old materials for a friend this week and came across a WebQuest I designed several years ago. In it, students explore the achievements of four Mesopotamian empires and then design a proposal for a new exhibit at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History. It was one of my favorite assignments, as it fostered the development of online reading comprehension and public speaking skills in a digital inquiry setting.

Now a second-year doctoral student, I’ve given quite a bit of thought to the inquiry process over the last year. One approach I like to use is the Inquiry Cycle, as highlighted by Ann P. Bishop and Bertram C. Bruce, which features five actions: Ask, Investigate, Create, Discuss, and Reflect. While depicted as a cycle, Bruce and Bishop are quick to note that inquiry does not take a neat, orderly process—the cycle is merely suggestive, not absolute. Sharing the WebQuest with a colleague allowed me the opportunity to reflect on the project with fresh eyes.

The challenge of inquiry-based instruction

Though proud of the task, I would revise it further as it reflects an issue that often comes up when using inquiry-based learning in schools; one I like to call the Bermuda Triangle of Inquiry.  For those unaware of the Bermuda Triangle, it’s an area of the Atlantic Ocean marked by geographic points of Miami, Puerto Rico and Bermuda, where planes and boats have inexplicably become lost throughout history.

In the Bermuda Triangle of Inquiry, tasks also can become lost, but in the Ask, Investigate and Create phases. Projects are sometimes unable to sustain themselves through to the Discuss or Reflect destinations. My Webquest project is a prime example of a task caught in the Triangle.  After moving through the first three phases, students shared their findings via the presentation, but I didn’t provide a space for discussion. Furthermore, students were not asked to reflect on their findings or given the time to think about ideas from their classmates.  After the presentations were given, the projects disappeared and, along with them, the opportunities for further thinking and exploration.

Shifting our inquiry-based instructional practices

We can begin to address this problem by making two shifts in how we approach inquiry learning. First, the creation portion of any inquiry could be viewed not as the end product of the Inquiry, but rather a jumping off point for discussion.  I’d suggest we look at creating from the constructionist’s vantage and see it as Pete Skillen wrote, part of “making one’s own mind.” Thus, the goal is not simply the creation of something, but also the sharing and discussion that follows, which allows us to “make” or “create” knowledge while reflecting on the conversation.

Secondly, we could change the primary goal of inquiry from finding the correct answer to finding one’s next question, as suggested by Douglas Thomas and John Seely Brown. Through discussion and reflection new questions can emerge. These questions can be shared and developed with peers for further discussion, reflection and exploration, which ensures that the cycle continues. Thus, the focus of inquiry becomes continuing the exploration, and not necessarily finding its end.

Possible Action Steps

So how might we change our practice to incorporate these fixes? Using my Mesopotamian Empire project as an example, I might have my students create a blog or a podcast asking them to reflect on their findings, choices and processes used to research and create their product. Their classmates would then be asked to read / listen and respond to their classmates’ work and ideas, providing suggestions or questions to consider for the next cycle of inquiry. In subsequent inquiry projects, students would be asked to use their peers’ feedback to guide their process. End reflection questions should ask students how they incorporated previous experiences and peer suggestions into their inquiry process. Texts like Teaching in the Connected Learning Classroom provide additional ideas for ways to enable students to discuss and reflect on their learning.

The second shift, from Inquiry as finding answers to Inquiry as finding questions, may be a bit more challenging. It requires teachers to provide students with more latitude on content and it also requires students to take ownership of their learning.  This autonomy necessitates open inquiry, but without navigation and critical evaluation skills, students will likely struggle to find answers and generate new questions. Most of all, it requires a teacher’s most precious resource: time. Frameworks like Genius Hour and Design Thinking provide useful frameworks that give structure and constraints for students to explore their interests organically. These approaches, combined with direct instruction in online reading comprehension provide the right supports and constraints to steer clear of our infamous Triangle!

Dave Quinn is a doctoral student in the URI/RIC Ph.D. in Education program. Previously, he was a history teacher at King Philip Middle School in Norfolk, MA and a member of the Seekonk School Committee. He can be reached at David_Quinn@my.uri.edu.

A university colleague and I recently spent time reflecting on how a local rural middle school teacher with whom we collaborated sought to shift her literacy instruction from less teacher-directed to more student-centered learning. Key in this transformation was the development of digital book projects by groups of students who had already read and discussed novels within small group literature circles. This was a quantum leap for students who had never imagined sharing or posting their thoughts and ideas online. Because this teacher and her students had no prior experience with collaborative digital composition tools, we suggested the use of VoiceThread for their maiden voyage. This Web 2.0 slide show tool allowed these students to feature text, images, or videos, and add written, audio, or sketched comments about archived content.

As in many rural school settings, this particular teacher had little tech support and no funding devoted to her new venture, so the recommendations we offered were chosen carefully. My colleague and I had both experienced past success with facilitating collaborative digital projects via the free version of VoiceThread in our own university teaching with students who were often novices with such technology tools. The middle school teacher we advised encountered similar success as students navigated VoiceThread’s features. Indeed, while she guided her middle-schoolers in the areas of digital image location and transfer, creation of PowerPoint slides, and then with initial uploading of their creations to VoiceThread, the students added self-scripted audio commentary to their book project content with surprising ease, enthusiasm, and excitement. While their final projects might seem simple and quite unsophisticated when judged by standards of seasoned gurus, students’ teachers, parents, and administrators in this rural setting were surprised and impressed at the outcomes shared on the big screen during a celebration of students’ efforts.

While reflecting on this digital book project experience, and particularly about our VoiceThread recommendation, we learned of other educators who had experienced success with even more challenging and diverse populations. Stein Brunvand and Sara Byrd of the University of Michigan-Dearborn highlighted multiple positive outcomes from integrating VoiceThread in learning experiences for special needs students. Identified benefits mirror many of our conclusions about usage with our rural middle-schoolers, including VoiceThread’s propensity for:

• Engaging students actively in meaning-making, including creation of content and the archiving of iterative commentary among multiple learners
• Supporting student creation and revision of archived digital projects from classrooms, computer labs, and/or any Internet-equipped setting
• Employing a simple core of technical skills that, once learned, can be used over and over again to communicate information and ideas across multiple content areas for a broad range of purposes.

Teachers Stein Brunvand and Sara Byrd further illustrated their success with VoiceThread through student profiles of three different learners whose challenges ranged from specific learning disabilities to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

In the midst of a global digital environment where Web 2.0 tools are commonplace and arrays of technology are at the disposal of some, microcosms exist where the use or existence of such technology is either not imagined, nor considered for students or within schools with a variety of needs or challenges. The use of free or low-cost, easy to navigate technology tools that offer the potential for a high degree of student success can open doors to virtual worlds for students who might otherwise remain unaware. VoiceThread is one such digital tool whose basics are straightforward and new features are cutting-edge, providing possibilities for collaborative multimodal digital learning experiences for all.

Terry S. Atkinson is an associate professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.

This article is part of a series from the International Reading Association’s Technology in Literacy Education Special Interest Group (TILE-SIG).