Literacy Now

Teaching With Tech
ILA Membership
ILA Next
ILA Journals
ILA Membership
ILA Next
ILA Journals
  • There is seemingly no end to valuable online literacy resources.

    • Blog Posts
    • Teaching With Tech

    Spotlighting Online Literacy Resources

    by Mary Beth Scumaci
     | Dec 19, 2014

    As 2015 quickly approaches, it is a perfect time to reflect and set some new goals. With that in mind, I would like to introduce you to some incredibly useful resources.

    First is Joan Sedita’s important work with literacy and her comprehensive website, Keys to Literacy. This website is well respected in the professional community and was cofounded with Brad Neuenhaus in 2007. Sedita earned her MEd from Harvard and has taught in the field of literacy for more than 35 years. She is a nationally recognized as a teacher trainer and author and Keys to Literacy is packed with practical literacy pedagogy, best teaching practices, and professional opportunities for literacy instructors in every grade, as well as for students and instructors in higher education. You will find the information and ideas can inform your lesson planning for learners with a range of ability levels.

    Keys to Literacy covers topics ranging from Common Core implementation to professional development. There are opportunities to subscribe to the Keys to Literacy Newsletter and the Literacy Lines blog and you can shop for books and posters in the online store. I challenge you to join me, along with thousands of other educators, and sign up for these FREE resources. Both are packed with the latest research from top experts in the field, best teaching practices, and resource links to help you improve your literacy instruction in ways that increase student learning.

    One especially informative resource on Sedita’s website is the Fall 2014 Keys to Literacy Newsletter. With the fast-paced challenges we face in the field of digital literacy, it is reassuring to have credible information that offers timely research for educators. This newsletter focuses on the differences between new literacy and traditional literacy skills, as well as online reading comprehension skills. I love integrating technology to enhance, motivate, engage, empower, and improve student learning, but I often wonder about how to most effectively teach online research and reading comprehension skills. This issue of the Keys to Literacy Newsletter provides links to Donald Leu’s work in The New Literacies Research Lab at the University of Connecticut’s NEAG School of Education and a wide assortment of related resources. From here, you can read up on current literacy research and learn more about the federally funded Online Research and Comprehension Assessment (ORCA) project. The newsletter also links you to the New Literacies and 21st Century Technologies Position Statement published by the International Reading Association (IRA); Julie Coiro’s supporting article about the importance of online reading comprehension titled Rethinking Online Reading Assessment published in Educational Leadership; and her podcast interview titled “How Offline Reading, Online Reading, and Prior Knowledge Can Help Predict Student’s Abilities to Understand What They Read Online” broadcasted on Voice of Literacy. Voice of Literacy, founded in 2008 by Betsy Baker, offers bi-weekly podcasts of interviews with literacy experts who discuss their research on improving literacy instruction and implications of their work for teachers, principals, parents and policy makers.

    As you can see, this post started with a focus on Sedita and her work with Keys to Literacy and quickly migrated into a mashup of experts and resources in the literacy field. Make it your New Year’s resolution to visit the website and sign-up for the Keys to Literacy Newsletter and the Literacy Lines blog so you don’t miss a beat (or a syllable)!

    Mary Beth Scumaci is a Clinical Associate Professor with the Division of Education at Medaille College in Buffalo, New York. She can be reached at mscumaci@medaille.edu.

    This post is part of a series from the International Reading Association’s Technology in Literacy Education Special Interest Group (TILE SIG).

     
    Read More
  • Teachers sometimes hesitate to fully embrace technology because it's scary and uncomfortable to try something new. But it can still be rewarding.

    • Blog Posts
    • Teaching With Tech

    Telling an Animated Story

    by Tim Flanagan
     | Dec 05, 2014

    Integrating technology into the classroom can be motivating, exciting and rewarding for both students and teachers.  It can also be scary and uncomfortable to try something new.  Teachers who hesitate to use technology in the classroom may not realize, however, that doing so does not mean abandoning what has worked for them in the past.  

    Take digital storytelling, as Abi Smart writes about “Combining traditional and new literacies in a 21st century writing workshop.” The writing process of planning, drafting, conferring, revising, and creating/publishing is the same, whether using digital tools or paper and pencil.  Teachers can still teach the writing process, including their favorite mini-lessons about the craft of writing, but digital tools can enhance what they have always done.  

    Using digital tools is not a new way to teach writing; it is a way to engage students and even deepen their understanding of the writing process.  In an earlier post, educator Hani Morgan cites many of the benefits of digital storytelling, especially for struggling writers.  Digital stories can also challenge gifted learners, as discussed in Lynda Kieler’s article from Gifted Child Today.  

    I first tried digital storytelling with my seventh grade language arts students last year using GoAnimate for Schools, a tool for creating animated movies.  I created my own video on GoAnimate so I could become familiar with the tools.  I knew I would not be able to answer every question that came up during the process, but being familiar with the tool made me more comfortable and better able to assist my students.  The students were so excited they actually clapped after watching my video introduction—not a typical response for seventh graders!

    Following the writing process, the students then brainstormed possible themes for their story and used a planning sheet to identify the story elements and create a storyboard.  The students were eager to create detailed plans so that they could begin exploring the tools on GoAnimate.  Class time was then devoted to “playing” with this new tool.  Along the way, some students took the lead and learned how to do many things that I hadn’t yet learned.  These students became the experts as students delved into constructing their story.  We created a shared Google Doc for students to contribute tips and suggestions for creating a GoAnimate video.   

    At this point in the writing process, students were ready to confer with other groups and provide feedback for each other on their movie drafts.  I taught mini-lessons on improving the quality of the videos, incorporating more authors’ tools and strengthening story elements.  The students then had time to revise their movies before sharing them on our movie preview day.

    The final products, as expected, varied in quality.  Some students went beyond what was expected while others completed just the basics.  This is not because I used GoAnimate; it would be true had I taught this unit with the traditional writing process and no digital tools.  This video shows one student’s story about gender stereotypes.

    Overall, the students found it challenging to create a short video and gained a new appreciation for all the planning that goes into each detail when telling a digital story.   In order to improve the project, I will make several changes this year.  One of the biggest will be that students will actually write a short narrative first, and then boil their narrative down to a GoAnimate video.  I may provide the option of using another tool I have just learned about, Pixton, which will allow students to turn their story into a graphic novel.  This project enabled students to achieve the traditional narrative writing goals as well as gain practice with important digital literacy skills.  

    Tim Flanagan is a seventh grade language arts teacher at Pawcatuck Middle School in Stonington, Connecticut.  He holds a Sixth Year degree in Instructional Technologies and Digital Media Literacy from the University of New Haven.  You can read his blog and follow him on Twitter (@tflanagan01).

    This post is part of a series from the International Reading Association’s Technology in Literacy Education Special Interest Group (TILE SIG).

    Read More
  • There are tools to help organize and facilitate online comments for the classroom and beyond.
    • Blog Posts
    • Teaching With Tech

    Facilitating Online Discussions About Text

    by Chris Sloan
     | Nov 21, 2014

    If you have ever participated in an online discussion that had loads of comments, chances are you’ve experienced some difficulty following the thread. CommentPress and NowComment are two applications to facilitate better conversations for readers.

    CommentPress, a WordPress plugin, was an outgrowth of the “networked books” projects from the Institute for the Future of the Book. It works by placing the comments next to the text, rather than below the text and, according to its developers, transforms the page into a “visual representation of dialog, and re-imagining the book itself as a conversation.”

    The introduction to Web Writing: Why and How for Liberal Arts Teaching and Learning illustrates the functionality of CommentPress. The comment area moves with the reader in the right-hand column as the page is scrolled, changing its contents depending on which paragraph in the left-hand column is selected. This interface facilitated some robust conversations for the authors, including more than 1,000 comments by readers of the 2013 open peer review edition of the text.

    NowComment is similar to CommentPress in a number of ways, but also has some teacher-friendly features. Recently my high school students in Utah participated in a conversation with other students in New York about the article This is Not a Life written by Paul Salopek. Because students in this collaboration were as young as sixth grade, the exchanges that took place in NowComment were much different than the conversations of that same article at National Geographic or the companion educational site, Out of Eden Learn.

    Word balloons in the left pane show readers what parts of the text have comments on them. When a reader sees something of interest in the article, a click on the balloon shows what other people are saying about that part of the article. Alternatively readers could click on a comment in the right pane and be taken to the part of the article that the comment is referring to.

    There are some additional features that may appeal to teachers. A common issue with classroom discussion (whether face-to-face or online) is when a student says something like, “She already said what I was going to say.” To minimize this kind of non-participation, NowComment allows teachers to hide all comments for a period of time and then show them once every student has responded. Other useful features allow teachers to keep texts private or open them up to anyone, send an email reminder to students, assign a cutoff date for submissions or delay posting comments if there’s something they need to address first with a particular student.  NowComment also enables students to sort their comments to provide a portfolio of their responses over time.

    Teachers from the elementary grades through college have used NowComment. For example, a second grade teacher uploaded a Time for Kids article and then entered the class discussion into the interface, modeling how to comment online. A middle school teacher whose class read Omnivore’s Dilemma used NowComment to have her class discuss The Father of the Chicken Nugget. A high school AP Statistics teacher in a hybrid setting uploaded an article exploring the correlation between the salary of Major League Baseball teams and their winning records. Undergraduate university students in a screenwriting course provided peer review on a piece of original writing, Chess Club. I’ve also used it in a MAT graduate class that I teach.

    It’s exciting to see how both CommentPress and NowComment allow readers to treat annotation more like conversation, literally moving discussion closer to the text.

    Chris SloanChris Sloan teaches high school English and media at Judge Memorial in Salt Lake City, Utah. He is also a PhD candidate in Educational Psychology and Educational Technology at Michigan State University. Join him on the Teachers Teaching Teachers webcast every Wednesday at 9 p.m. ET.

     
    Read More
  • As literacy educators continue to question how interest-based online spaces can inform classrooms, the case of fan fiction sites might be closer to our classroom instruction than we think.
    • Blog Posts
    • Teaching With Tech

    Online Fan Fiction Spaces as Literacy Tools

    by Jayne C. Lammers
     | Nov 14, 2014
    Much has been written about the youth experience of literacy learning when they create and share fanfiction online. Previous features on Reading Today Online have outlined what learning looks like for adolescent participants in Hunger Games fan spaces and have shed light on the particular writing practices recruited by sites like Fanfiction.net. However, less is known about the nature of teaching in these online, fan-based, informal learning environments. How do online spaces teach fans the expectations of digital literacy practices such as writing fanfiction? What pedagogical tools establish the curriculum, teaching, evaluation, and social norms of an online fanfiction space?

    I explored similar questions in a study published in Learning, Media and Technology about the nature of pedagogy in an online fanfiction space. In particular, I studied adolescent literacy in an online forum called The Sims Writers’ Hangout (The Hangout has since disappeared, but evidence of the group’s creative work still appears on Flickr and elsewhere online). The Hangout was an online space for fans of the videogame The Sims to gather and support each other’s writing of Sims fanfiction—multimodal, digital texts that pair images taken in the video game with narratives authors write (see examples of Sims fanfiction created with The Sims 3). Over its five-year existence, The Hangout had more than 12,000 members, mostly adolescent females, from all over the world who posted over 660,000 messages on a variety of Sims-related and community-building topics to establish an online network of readers and writers.

    To better understand the pedagogy of The Hangout, I drew from data collected over two years spent documenting the space through the participation of eight young women (ages 15 - 23) from the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States. Through analysis of virtual interviews, Hangout posts, and the Sims fanfiction my informants shared and the readers’ responses they received, I came to the following understandings about the nature of literacy pedagogy in this online fanfiction space:

    • Attention paid to creating social order. Moderators, who themselves were adolescents, wrote numerous posts detailing The Hangout’s expectations. As members join and begin to explore the site’s Welcome area, they are immediately instructed to follow the rules with posts that read, “By reading the rules, you will prove to everyone that you’re an intelligent asset to this community.” Those rules, for example, provided expectations about showing respect and posting in the correct sub-forum. They also detail the following consequences for breaking rules: “First offense: Warning PM from staff. Second offense: Suspension of variable length, dependent on offense. Third offense: Permanent ban.” Throughout The Hangout, members received repeated messages establishing the social norms of this informal learning environment.
    • Contests serve as a form of pedagogy. To teach members how to design high-quality images, The Hangout ran contests such as The Hangout’s Next Top Model—a multi-round contest based on the similarly named reality television show. Each round required participants to place their “model” in a different scene and post an image for member voting. The image published with this piece represents a submission for a round which asked contestants to style their model after an iconic actor/actress of their choice. The multimodal combination of images and written narratives is an important feature of Sims fanfiction, and The Hangout communicated expectations for quality in digital image editing in part through contests within the space.
    • All reader feedback instructs writers.As with other online writing spaces, The Hangout readers posted comments and reviews of Sims fanfiction shared in the space. Some such posts included specific praise or constructive feedback about an author’s writing or images, as this comment received by one participant: “I liked it Eve, the dancing and the kiss in the rain was brilliant! ...I thought maybe some more description could have been added...” However, most reader response took on a form known as “fangirl” comments. Such comments offered gushing, unspecific praise that left one of my participants wondering, “well okay, but what was good about it?” when she received such comments. Though, all of the Sims fanfiction writers I spoke to shared the opinion that even fangirl comments provide motivation to keep writing. In these ways, all reader feedback instructs writers and encourages them to share.

    Moderators who established and enforced social norms, activities that communicated expectations for quality Sims fanfiction, and readers who provided constructive and motivating feedback to writers constructed pedagogy in The Hangout. As literacy educators continue to question how interest-based online spaces can inform classrooms, the case of The Hangout shows us that pedagogy within these sites might be closer to our classroom instruction than we think.  

    Jayne C. Lammers is an assistant professor and director of the secondary English teacher preparation program at the University of Rochester. She can be reached at jlammers@warner.rochester.edu or on Twitter at @URocProf.

     
    Read More
  • These titles can draw in struggling readers and still challenge more confident ones.

    • Blog Posts
    • Teaching With Tech

    Using Digital Notebooks for Modern Writing Students

    by Kristine E. Pytash
     | Nov 07, 2014

    After studying writing instruction in 20 middle and high schools, Applebee and Langer  found that when technology was incorporated into writing instruction it was often done so in a way that “reinforced” teacher-centered pedagogical practices. In fact, the most common use of technology during writing instruction was students typing their final papers. However, in the instances when teachers did use technology during writing instruction, the writing process became accessible for students and they became more fully engaged.  

    Additional research supports the critical need for technology to be effectively integrated into the writing classroom.  Even young adults have strong opinions of the writing instruction they need to be effective writers. The Pew Internet Organization found that while only 50 percent of teens say they are required to write everyday, 82 percent of young adults feel more in-class writing would improve their abilities. And when it comes to technology, 78 percent of young adults think their writing would improve if technology-based writing tools were integrated into their classroom.

    Writing teachers have long been advocates of writers’ notebooks. Ralph Fletcher  said the writer’s notebook gives the writer “space to record and explore what amazes, delights, disgusts, or appalls [him].” Writer’s notebooks can provide a space for students to:

    • Document their lives
    • Ask questions
    • Brainstorm new ideas and writing topics
    • Record meaningful thoughts
    • Experiment with new genres
    • Take risks in their writing

    Teachers should also consider keeping a writer’s notebook as a way to model writing and share their writing with students. Some great sources of ideas about what you might include in a Writer’s notebook include Mrs. Madison’s ideas for organizing a notebook with elementary aged students, a fifth grade teacher’s summary of examples, Stacey Shubitz’s examples of Writing About Reading in the Writer’s Notebook, and a Pinterest collection of assorted notebook examples and writing prompts.  

    While I have always used traditional print-based writer’s notebooks with middle school students, high school students, and pre-service teachers, I now use digital tools to facilitate digital writer notebooks.

    If you are interested in exploring digital tools for writer notebooks, Penzu, Little Memory, and Penmia are just a few of the online journal applications. While there are differences between these particular digital tools, there are many similarities. Each
    journaling tool allows students to not only write entries, but to also organize and categorize their writing using tags. For example, a student could have tags, such as “brainstorming ideas,” “topics I want to explore,” and “creative writing entries.” 

    Students can also customize their notebooks with themed backgrounds, highlighting features, and various fonts.  Penzu, Little Memory, and Penmia also allow students to upload photos and clipart to their journal entries. In addition, each tool allows for students to share their writings with others. For example, Penmia is integrated with social media outlets, such as Twitter and Facebook. Students can also share by inviting others to read only certain entries.  Finally, there are upgrades. Penzu also offers Penzu Classroom, which provides additional features such as collaborating and grading options. 

    While teachers can select which digital tool would best fit their classroom needs, it’s important to remember that choice is tied to ownership. A teacher might present all three tools and allow students to select the online journaling app they like best.

    The benefits of using digital notebooks are many, including if a student begins writing at school, and wants to finish, revise, or edit at home, it is possible with this app. In addition, many digital notebook applications can be used with computers and also mobile devices providing more options for teachers and students. 

    You might also be inspired by Kate Messner’s mini-lesson about what to put in a writer’s notebook and some examples of Monday Morning warm-ups provided by freelance writer Jo Knowles as you think of ways your students can use their digital journals in your class. 

     

    Kristine E. Pytash is an assistant professor at Kent State University. She can be contacted at kpytash@kent.edu.

     

    Read More
Back to Top

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives